When it comes to ‘saving globalisation’ world leaders are still missing the point
–Shuaihua Cheng Managing Director for China, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) As trade liberalisation and globalisation more broadly are called into question, G20 leaders could do with both interpreting the situation and changing it. It is not an easy task for the G20, which is a diverse group of developed and emerging economies, accounting for around 80% of GDP. In spite of their great success in launching a trade and investment working group and agreeing on guiding principles of investment policy-making, G20 leaders failed to address the emergence of anti-globalisation voices. Here are four things they got wrong – and three ways they can turn the situation around in 2017. When protectionism makes sense Here’s the first thing they got wrong when they met in China: their statement reaffirming their “opposition to protectionism on trade and investment in all its forms”. In fact, this is not only legally inaccurate, but it’s beyond their political mandate. In the World Trade Organisation’s current rule book, certain defensive trade measures are totally legitimate. That includes anti-dumping and countervailing duties, safeguard measures, and other restrictive policy instruments to protect public interest. The only caveat is these measures must be applied in a way that is consistent with the conditions and methodologies agreed by all members. Opposing all forms of protection unnecessarily raises public fears and is politically hazardous. Some protectionist measures are designed to function as indispensable safety valves, to ensure that nations have the right to restrict trade and investment in certain, clearly defined conditions, while still benefiting from progressively liberalised trade and investment. Far from being condemned, this type of protective trade measure should be guaranteed. In 2017, G20 leaders may wish to take a more legally sensible and politically nuanced approach. They could instead, for example, call on all members […]